Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Celebrating the Interdependent Web of Life!

One of my favorite  passages from The Color Purple – by Alice Walker – is when Shug explains The Divine – also known as God – to Celi. Here’s that passage:

“Here's the thing, say Shug. The thing I believe. God is inside you and inside everybody else. You come into the world with God. But only them that search for it inside find it. And sometimes it just manifest itself even if you not looking, or don't know what you looking for. Trouble do it for most folks, I think. Sorrow, lord. Feeling like shit.

It? I ast.

Yeah, It. God ain't a he or a she, but a It.

But what do it look like? I ast.

Don't look like nothing, she say. It ain't a picture show. It ain't something you can look at apart from anything else, including yourself. I believe God is everything, say Shug. Everything that is or ever was or ever will be. And when you can feel that, and be happy to feel that, you've found It.

Shug a beautiful something, let me tell you. She frown a little, look out cross the yard, lean back in her chair, look like a big rose. She say, My first step from the old white man (god) was trees. Then air. Then birds. Then other people. But one day when I was sitting quiet and feeling like a motherless child, which I was, it come to me: that feeling of being part of everything, not separate at all. I knew that if I cut a tree, my arm would bleed. And I laughed and I cried and I run all around the house. I knew just what it was.

Shug had discovered what we refer to in our Seventh Principle as "The Interdependent Web of all Existence." It took a while for her to discover it.  And it took Unitarians and Universalists a while as well.  Before they merged in 1961, there were some Principles that were floating around that became the basis for the Principles that were adopted.  But there were only six of them.  The Unitarians especially were folks that valued independence – not dependence.  Ralph Waldo Emerson helped to shape the myth of independence.  He was Unitarian minister but left that to be a writer.  In affirming the virtue of self-reliance he said,   “Do not seek outside yourself.”  Look within yourself for Truth.”  Now of course, he’s saying we should look within themselves for meaning rather than conform to others and that’s empowering. But he failed to acknowledge how he had relied on others all along the way to be ABLE to be an independent thinker – teachers, scholars, and others.  Plus he could rely on family for the affluence that allowed him to be a non-comformist.  Indeed, he needed others.  And that is not something to be ashamed of.   

Indeed, we don’t want folks to think of us as needy.  But we all are.  We need one another.  And we need plants and animals and a healthy earth.  

So we are here today to SHARE our experiences together.  We will pour our waters into a common bowl, as use these waters as we bless our babies together and water our plants.  
We are proud of our Seventh Principle and we celebrate "the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part" with our Water Communion.

(Homily followed by celebration of Water Communion).

Saturday, June 13, 2015

My Confession

Back in the 80’s, when I was a Professor of Education at Georgia Southern University, my research centered on the teacher shortage that was prevalent at that time.  And I also studied various subgroups (related to subject areas, ethnicity, gender, and more) as this connected to the broader category.  I became particularly interested in the shortage of African American teachers because their numbers were dropping dramatically.  My research partner (who was also white) and I did both quantitative and qualitative studies examining this problem.  We found some interesting information.  But that’s not the point of this posting.  Like most academicians, we presented our research at a variety of conferences.  And when folks would look in the room and see two white folks at the front preparing to present, some would walk out and say they had the wrong room.  Then they would come back in and ASK – "Is this the presentation on African American teacher shortage?"  Both black and white academicians had a difficult time seeing two white folks presenting on this topic.  Some even felt that it was inappropriate – that we were stepping in to access areas of research that should have been designated and “saved” for African American scholars.  I worried that I was overstepping in some way, and invited an African American colleague to join us in presenting at future conferences.  REALLY.  She wasn’t even that interested.  But I wanted us to appear credible.  Then at some point, I thought that our work was ready for publication.  I wanted to publish in a journal with national access, because this was a national problem.  And I thought the problem and our findings were broader than just education, so I wanted to publish in a journal with a broader readership.  I decided to submit the work to the Urban League Review, a scholarly journal published by the National Urban League, whose mission is “to enable African Americans to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.”  Now I could have shared with them that I was a white ally researching problems related to the African American teacher shortage.  But I did not.  I was afraid that the editors might have the same biases that some attending my presentations had.   I wanted not just a blind review – but a color blind review.  They accepted the article and published it.  I was delighted, but always felt that I may have been somewhat deceptive.  I knew that they probably assumed I was black.  Most of the folks researching topics like this were.  And I did nothing to let them know anything different than that.  Now I did not purposely tan my skin and kink my hair to get this article published.  So I’m not comparing what I did with Rachel’s very obvious deception.  However, I am admitting that I probably profited (not financially of course) from not fully disclosing my identity.  And I realized that this is not the only time.  For years, I closeted my religious beliefs for greater acceptance in my community.  And I’ve ALSO researched, presented, and published articles related to LGBTQ concerns without “outing” myself as someone in a mixed gender relationship.  SO – this is my confession!  And I’m asking you, the reader, have you EVER misrepresented some aspect of your identity or hidden it for some reason?  Probably so.  And if that is the case, I suppose we need to be a little more humble in our attacks on others. 

Monday, March 30, 2015

Palm Wavers or Naysayers

Palm Sunday - 2015

Children's Story:

This morning I’m going to share a special story with you from this book – The Bible.  Now like many other stories I’ve shared with you, this story is very old – and it’s told a little differently in different parts of the Bible – and we are not really sure how much of it is true  -- but these are very good stories and we can learn a lot from them. 

This story is about the man called Jesus.  We’ve shared stories of Jesus here before and told stories that Jesus shared with others.  And most of us consider Jesus to be a great teacher whose stories and sermons encouraged people to love one another and to care for others.  But long ago many people wanted Jesus to be much more than that.  And actually, that’s still true for some today.

Jesus lived in a land called Palestine – and that land was controlled by a foreign government, the Romans.  Well – actually back in Jesus’ day – the Roman Empire was very big and the Romans controlled many lands.   

Jesus was a Jewish man and many Jews wanted to be free of the Romans and be able to rule their own land.  And they were looking for a KING who would lead an army that would revolt and overthrow the Roman government.  And because Jesus had attracted very large crowds when he taught, they thought that perhaps he could be that King and lead that revolt. 

Well, it was the time for a big Jewish holy day called, The Passover.  Many Jews came to their holy city of Jerusalem to celebrate The Passover so there were huge crowds there.  And these folks heard from other crowds following Jesus that he was headed for Jerusalem.  And they were very happy! 

Jesus knew that they were looking for a leader.  And he thought that he could be a good leader – one who would teach them to love and respect one another.  So before he came into the city, he got his disciples to bring him a small donkey for him to ride, because a prophet of long ago had said that the King would ride in on a donkey. 
Well, when the crowds saw Jesus riding that donkey they got very excited.  They wanted to greet him like royalty.  But they didn’t have any RED carpet to put down – like we see the kings and even movie stars walk on.  So you know what they did?  They put down their garments (which just means clothes – like their coats) on the road.  And they put down branches from the trees.  And one of the stories said that they waved Palm branches and put these down on the street as Jesus came by. 

So when Jesus entered Jerusalem it was kind of like a parade – with people on all the sides singing and shouting praises at Jesus.  And they called him their King and waved the Palm branches.  And that is why many folks call this Sunday – the Sunday before Easter – PALM Sunday.   So that day was a really FUN and exciting day in Jerusalem.

But then the people found out that Jesus was not going to be the kind of King that led a revolt against the Romans.  And many of them were not happy with Jesus anymore.  They did not understand that the message Jesus was teaching was much greater than any war victory, because Jesus was not a person who encouraged violence.  Instead, Jesus was a person who encouraged peace. 

So when we see these palms and here about Palm Sunday – we need to remember the stories that Jesus taught that said, “Be peacemakers, Love your neighbor, and even Love your enemy.”

Let’s try to do just that today.  


It was Palm Sunday, but because of a sore throat, five year old Johnny stayed home from the local Episcopal Church with his grandmother. When his family returned home, they were carrying several palm fronds. Johnny asked them what they were for.
      "People held them over Jesus' head as he walked by," his father told him.
      "Dang it," Johnny fumed, "the one Sunday I don't go and he shows up."

Well, Johnny really had a pretty good question.   What WERE the Palm fronds really for?    I did try to do some research to find out the answer to little Johnny’s question.  And I got conflicting responses.  It seems that the Palm represented something different depending on when it was being waved and who was waving it.  

During pre-Christian times, the Palm was a symbol of military victory – especially for the Jews.   Remember the Maccabees that we sing about at Hanukah?  Jewish historians tell us that after their victory, they marched triumphantly into Jerusalem waving palm fronds as a sign of their military victory.  

SO – some interpreters of Christian scriptures share that folks welcoming Jesus were waving Palms because THEY were expecting a Messiah who would lead a military revolt against the Roman government.  And the hope was that this charismatic figure called Jesus would be the King that could do just that. 
Another source said that Jewish people often waved palms at celebrations.  They were especially used at harvest celebrations and represented peace and plenty.  But they were waved at other celebrations as well.  Hey – they didn’t have balloons back then.  So, if you think about it, most of the folks entering Jerusalem were there to celebrate the Passover.  Could it be that they happened to have had Palm branches in their hands ANY way – because they were celebrating?  Perhaps so!

And then finally, many Christian scholars identify the palm as representing – not military victory – but victory of the faithful believers over the enemies of the soul. 

So the answer to little Johnny’s question would depend on which preacher is standing in the pulpit.  Since I’m here today, I’ll go with door # 1.  If there were Palms, my guess is that the folks were waving them in hopes of being saved from the Romans – not from some spiritual hell.  

A second bit of conflicting symbolism is related to that little donkey Jesus rode.  Now Jesus was a man who walked. He walked everywhere, – as did most folks back then.   So WHY ride now?  And why ride this iddy biddy colt? 
If you study the Christian gospels, you will discover that much was written to coincide with Hebrew Scripture prophesies – like many of the events related to Jesus’ birth.   It’s almost like someone took all these prophesies and composed a story that seemed to “fit” – although sometimes the fit was like putting the square peg in the round hole, but nevertheless, it gets in there.  And then the writer even says:  “This was done to fulfill the prophesy.”  The Jews (or at least some of them) had been looking for a messiah for some time – and these Christian gospels seemed to be written, at least partially, to proclaim – hey, Jesus is the man.  Now in the reading from John that you heard earlier, the writer quotes a prophesy that says:  “Do not be afraid, O Daughter of Zion; see, your king is coming, seated on a donkey's colt."  I did a little background research and found this prophesy in chapter 9 of Zachariah – a minor prophet book in the Old Testament that declares visions of horrible destruction followed by wonderful celebrations of the Jewish people after defeating all their enemies.  This chapter ends with the following prediction:    “How attractive and beautiful they will be! Grain will make the young men thrive, and new wine the young women.”  No wonder the crowd got excited! So one obvious reason for Jesus riding the donkey would be because he was well-versed in the Hebrew Scriptures, and WANTED people to draw the conclusion that he was the prophesized messiah.   

Now some say that Jesus intentionally rode in on this donkey to humble himself.  These bible interpreters claim that most leaders would be riding in on a horse – not a slow pokey donkey.  And this little donkey – never ridden before – was to convey a message of humility.  In any case, I’m sure that if Jesus did arrive on the slow pokey donkey – some might have been disappointed.  I know that feeling myself.  After our current president was elected, I was hoping for our leader to ride in on a fast horse called CHANGE – and immediately cleanse our land of evils like “Don’t ask, don’t tell,”  “a broken health care system,” “an unfair tax structure,” and certainly, “unnecessary wars.”  Instead, I’ve had to adjust to this donkey ride – but we’ve gotten there on some of my hopes.  

Although there are some discrepancies in the three gospels that tell this story, they all have jubilant crowds praising Jesus as he nears the city.  One of the gospels, however, also includes some verses that indicate Jesus’ realization that these crowds obviously had not heard his teachings.  In Luke, the writer shares that when this jubilant parade was nearing Jerusalem, Jesus wept.
Luke 19: 41-42 states: “As Jesus drew near to the city of Jerusalem he wept over it saying, “If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace!!  But now they are hidden from your eyes.” 
The writer of Luke said he cried for Jerusalem.  But one also has to wonder if he didn’t cry for himself, for Jesus likely knew that the end was near.  He was seen by the establishment as one who did not follow their rules and who openly criticized them, and he had attracted a huge following.  That scared the folks who had been in the more privileged groups of authority.  And we know – even looking today – what can happen when folks are fearful that they may lose their power.  

So Jesus was sad – and he wept. As one of the songs in our hymnal says:  (sing) “With sudden grief his eyes grew wet, and soon his weeping drowned his sight.”

After he entered the city, he also experienced some other very difficult emotions.   When he visited the temple, he realized that the temple he had loved had turned into a den of thieves – with moneychangers using their positions to take advantage of the poor religious folks who came to make their required sacrifices.  We usually refer to Jesus as one who was “meek and mild.”  But according to the gospels, that is not the Jesus that entered the temple that day.  He was furious!  He threw out the merchants and those selling the doves for sacrifice and overturned their tables.  Now some scholars tell us that this story is probably metaphorical – with the temple representing Israel and the moneychangers representing the established religious order.  Perhaps so!  But since we are telling this as a story – anyway – that may or may not be true – anyway, let’s include the angry Jesus.  

When Jesus celebrated the Passover with his disciples, he experienced lots of other emotions – including love and compassion for his disciples as he gently washed their feet.  And I’m sure extreme disappointment as he acknowledged that he knew his betrayer.  

Later that night in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus experienced frustration with his disciples for falling asleep, anguish as he contemplated his fate, fear as he begged his Heavenly Father for some possibility for escape.  And then…. And then…..

There was another crowd – another huge crowd here in this city that had welcomed Jesus with Hosanna’s and Palm branches just a few days before.  But this crowd was not jubilant – this was an angry mob, calling out with the encouragement of the high priests, “Crucify him.”  “Crucify him.”
How did songs of praise turn into shouts calling for torture and death?  Of course another question is:  are these the same people?    Maybe the Palm Wavers left the city – all hiding out, like many of Jesus disciples were doing.  And maybe those who had stayed away from Jesus’ jubilant entry because they were not fans of Jesus (the naysayers if you will) – now turned out to demand his death.  That is very possible.  But there are probably others who just joined both crowds and were swayed by others to behave with the crowd in both instances.  

When I was a young teenager, my mom used to give me instruction about lots of things and warn me about “the crowd.”  She would say – “Now Jane, be careful not to just go along with the crowd.”  Well, I took her advice.  And here I am.  And I would probably bet that most of you sitting here are not easily caught up with crowd mentality – or you probably wouldn’t be here, where we are all pretty independent thinkers.  But it even happens with us now and then, doesn’t it?  We just want to go along with a different crowd.  I want to shop at the farmer’s market, and buy second hand clothes, and drive a hybrid, and come to church here!  I hope that I’m doing those things because it’s the right thing to do, - but I also have to admit that I like being with like-minded folks and doing things that like-minded folks do!  And that’s okay, as long as I monitor the reasons I’m involved in certain activities and make sure that I’m weighing out whether or not these activities are really the best things for me to do.
In preparation for this sermon, I studied lots of social psychology – specifically related to crowd psychology, herd psychology, collective behavior, crowd manipulation, etc.  And I found that scholars are not in agreement about a lot of this – and in fact, many of the theories that were popular in the 19th and early 20th century related to things like “group think,” are now being debunked by others.  So I’m not going to go into a lot of specifics on any one of these with you.  But I will share a summary of the three major theories and you can see how each of these might present an explanation of the crowds in Jesus’ day and in ours as well.

The first theory is:
Contagion Theory - the Contagion Theory was formulated by Gustave Le Bon. According to him, crowds exert a hypnotic influence over their members. Shielded by their anonymity, large numbers of people abandon personal responsibility and surrender to the contagious emotions of the crowd…. Le Bon's Theory, although one of the earliest explanations of crowd behavior, is still used by many people. However, critics argue that the "collective mind" has not been documented by systematic studies. 

The second theory is:
Convergence Theory - whereas the Contagion Theory states that crowds cause people to act in a certain way, Convergence theory states that people who want to act in a certain way come together to form crowds. It asserts that people with similar attributes find other like-minded persons with whom they can release underlying tendencies.

And finally, the third theory is:
Emergent-Norm Theory - according to Ralph Turner and Lewis Killian, crowds begin as collectivities, composed of people with mixed interests and motives. Especially in the case of less stable crowds, like crowds gathered in protest, norms may be vague and changing, as when one person decides to break the glass windows of a store and others join in and begin looting merchandise. In short, people in crowds make their own rules as they go along.  And this theory may explain some of the crowd behavior in Jerusalem that week.

Although most of us need community, we do NOT need a crowd.  And I dare say – Jesus did not NEED a crowd.  In fact, he often tried to get AWAY from the crowd.  But he did need community.  And his community failed him.  
 On that fateful Friday as he hung from that cross – where were the Palm wavers then?  Where were even his closest disciples?  Who was there for him?  According to Christian scriptures, his crowd of supporters had disappeared – replaced by the curious and those who enjoyed macabre events like crucifixion.    It was too hot for the Palm wavers and disciples – and they left the kitchen.  Well, at least according to the three synoptic gospels – Matthew, Mark, and Luke.  Now the writer of John places the three Marys there and John as well. So we don’t really know for sure who was there – but certainly not most of those who were supposedly his closest community.  

Now, it’s easy for us to criticize the disciples – yet – how many of us are guilty of the same thing.  We can hang there when things are going well, but sometimes we find other reasons to absent ourselves when things become more difficult.  Can you think of a situation where you have done that?  …………………..   Most of us can if we are honest with ourselves.  We’ll wave the Palms – thank you very much!  But don’t ask us to be there with the pain and suffering.  (Now, of course, I’m not speaking of those situations where we must leave to protect our families, ourselves, or our sanity. – Okay?)

Yes, in that old, old, gospel story, Jesus wept that day when he entered Jerusalem – for he knew his message of peace had not been heard and the end was near.  And on that cross –forsaken by his community – he cried; he cried out – “My God, my God – why has thou forsaken me?”  Is it any wonder he felt forsaken by God when others were not there?  

We need one another – in times of Joy and Sorry.

No, we don’t need a crowd of Palm wavers, but we all need a few hand palm wavers to say, “Hey – I see you, and I care.”  Do you know of someone you need to wave to today, perhaps with a phone call or card or email?   Is there someone here in this congregation who could use a hug today?  You can get one here.

You know we folks have different theologies and beliefs.  But as we UU’s say, “We do not have to think alike to love alike.” So on this Palm Sunday – let’s wave our hand palms at folks today.  Let them know that we see them, we are there… we care.

Oh, may it be so!